How Economics Can Improve Antitrust Doctrine Towards Tie-In Sales: Comment on Tirole's 'an Analysis of Tying Cases: A Primer'
Competition Policy International, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 27-40, Spring 2005
15 Pages Posted: 21 Apr 2005
Abstract
Given the focus on tie-in sales in several recent antitrust cases, economists have turned their attention to the motivations and consequences of tying, significantly improving our understanding. Tirole has written an excellent primer focused on what we know about tying and what he believes is desirable antitrust policy concerning the practice. Although we agree with most of Tirole's arguments, there are two topics for which our perspective is somewhat different. First, we would add one situation to the ones identified by Tirole in which tying can harm competition and reduce welfare. Second, in his policy discussion Tirole stops short in some places of using theory to provide concrete guidance and restraint to antitrust enforcers. In other places his suggestions could lead to less rather than more clarity. We explain our reasons for preferring a more limited role for antitrust intervention than Tirole appears to recommend.
Keywords: Tying, Exclusion, Predation
JEL Classification: D4
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Competition, Monopoly, and Aftermarkets
By Dennis W. Carlton and Michael Waldman
-
Competition, Monopoly and Aftermarkets
By Michael Waldman and Dennis W. Carlton
-
The First Principles Approach to Antitrust, Kodak, and Antitrust at the Millennium