The Effect of the United States' Granting Most Favored Nation Status to Vietnam
29 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016
Date Written: November 1999
Abstract
If the United States grants Vietnam most favored nation status, both countries would benefit. Vietnamese exports to the United States would more than double, and Vietnam would gain substantial welfare benefits from improved market access and increased availability of imports. For the United States, lowering the current high tariffs against Vietnam would improve welfare by reducing costly diversion away from Vietnamese products.
Since the U.S. embargo on trade with Vietnam was lifted in 1994, exports from Vietnam to the United States have risen dramatically. However, Vietnam remains one of the few countries to which the United States has not yet granted most favored nation (MFN) status. The general tariff rates that the United States imposes average 35 percent compared with 4.9 percent for the MFN rate.
Granting MFN status to Vietnam would improve its terms of trade and help improve the efficiency of resource allocation in the country. Better access to the U.S. market would increase the volume of Vietnamese exports to the United States and the prices received for them while also reducing their costs to U.S. users.
Fukase and Martin use a computable general equilibrium model to examine the effects of reducing U.S. tariffs on Vietnamese imports from general rates to MFN rates. They estimate tariff changes using the U.S. tariff schedule for 1997 weighted by Vietnam`s exports to the United States. The results suggest that after a change to MFN status for Vietnam, its exports to the United States would more than double, from the 1996 baseline of $338 million to $768 million. By conservative estimates, welfare gains in Vietnam would be about $118 million a year, or a 0.9 percent increase in real income per capita. Sixty percent of that gain would come from improved terms of trade and the other 40 percent from gains in efficiency. Because Vietnam`s exports to the United States have been growing rapidly since the lifting of the embargo in 1994, the trade expansion resulting from MFN status may be larger by the time Vietnam obtains it. Based on 1998 values, the increase in exports would have been around $750 million a year.
For the United States, lowering the high tariffs on imports from Vietnam would improve consumer welfare by lowering prices and increasing the volume of those imports. The direct welfare gains in the United States are estimated to be $56 million a year.
There are likely to be significant additional gains to both countries from the liberalization Vietnam will undertake as a result of the negotiations for MFN status and for entry into the World Trade Organization.
This paper - a product of Trade, Development Research Group - is part of a larger effort in the group to understand the links between trade and development in transition economies. The authors may be contacted at efukase@worldbank.org or wmartin1@worldbank.org.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Coordinating Tariff Reduction and Domestic Tax Reform
By Michael Keen and Jenny E. Ligthart
-
On Selective Indirect Tax Reform in Developing Countries
By M. Shahe Emran and Joseph E. Stiglitz
-
Tax Revenue and (or?) Trade Liberalization
By Thomas Baunsgaard and Michael Keen
-
Coordinating Tariff Reduction and Domestic Tax Reform Under Imperfect Competition
By Michael Keen and Jenny E. Ligthart
-
Vat Base Broadening, Self Supply, and the Informal Sector
By John Piggott and John Whalley
-
By Vito Tanzi
-
Revenue Neutral Trade Reform with Many Households, Quotas and Tariffs