Could Community Contribution Companies Improve Access to Justice?

The Canadian Bar Review, Vol. 94, No. 2, 2016

Queen's University Legal Research Paper No. 2017-089

33 Pages Posted: 3 Mar 2017

Date Written: 2016

Abstract

The legal profession is engaged in two related debates: how to improve access to justice and whether to liberalize its rules of professional conduct to permit “alternative business structures” and non-lawyer ownership. The purpose of this article is to inform readers about the “community contribution company,” or C3 — a new type of hybrid corporation introduced in British Columbia — and to examine the potential of C3s or similar corporate forms to respond to both of these challenges. A C3 is a for-profit entity, but profits are subordinated to the company’s chosen “community purpose.” In the UK, where alternative business structures and non-lawyer ownership are permitted, a similar type of corporation has been used to provide both lowcost legal services and as a potential source of funding to free legal clinics. Canadian provincial law societies could use C3s to test alternative business structures and non-lawyer ownership through a corporate structure that addresses some of the concerns typically raised in this debate.

Keywords: corporate law, corporations, hybrid corporations, social enterprise, community contribution company

Suggested Citation

Henderson, Gail Elizabeth, Could Community Contribution Companies Improve Access to Justice? (2016). The Canadian Bar Review, Vol. 94, No. 2, 2016, Queen's University Legal Research Paper No. 2017-089, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2926531

Gail Elizabeth Henderson (Contact Author)

Queen's University - Faculty of Law ( email )

128 Union St
Kingston, Ontario K7L3N6
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
179
Abstract Views
883
Rank
303,525
PlumX Metrics