Why In Re Omegas Group Was Right: An Essay on the Legal Status of Equitable Remedies

14 Pages Posted: 24 Jul 2012

Date Written: 2011

Abstract

This article is part of a symposium on the new Restatement (Third) or Restitution and Unjust Enrichment. I take up the problem of constructive trusts in bankruptcy. The Restatement takes the position that constructive trust claimants have automatic priority in insolvency situations over ordinary creditors. I argue that this unduly reifies a remedial construct that is useful for capturing unjust enrichment but does not always do so in cases of insolvency.

Keywords: Constructive Trust, Restitution, Unjust Enrichment

Suggested Citation

Sherwin, Emily L., Why In Re Omegas Group Was Right: An Essay on the Legal Status of Equitable Remedies (2011). Boston University Law Review, Vol. 92, No. 3, 2012, Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-54, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2115586

Emily L. Sherwin (Contact Author)

Cornell University - Law School ( email )

Myron Taylor Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
89
Abstract Views
1,037
Rank
520,775
PlumX Metrics