Neighbourhood Effects: Can We Measure Them and Does it Matter?
29 Pages Posted: 14 Jul 2008
Date Written: November 2003
Abstract
Renewed interest in disadvantaged neighbourhoods is generating increasing research activity. Current work includes qualitative community studies and quantitative investigations of area effects on individual outcomes. This paper criticises the contribution of area effects research to date. Methodological and data constraints mean that quantitative studies often operationalise a weak conception of neighbourhood that does not reflect the understanding gained from qualitative work. These constraints present a barrier to testing specific theories that might usefully inform policy, while exaggerated claims are made about the policy relevance of more generic work. The paper concludes that area effects should be accorded less significance in the broad debate on area-based policy. Multi-disciplinary work is needed to develop studies that can influence the design of specific programmes.
JEL Classification: I30
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Poverty, Social Exclusion and Neighbourhood: Studying the Area Bases of Social Exclusion
By Howard Glennerster, Ruth Lupton, ...
-
Places Apart? The Initial Report of Cases Areas Study
By Ruth Lupton
-
Area-Based Initiatives: The Rationale and Options for Area Targeting
-
Social Exclusion and Children: A European View for a Us Debate
-
By Julian Le Grand and Liz Richardson
-
Talking to Families in East London: A Report on the First Stage of the Research
-
Social Exclusion and the Future of Cities
By Anne Power and William Julius Wilson
-
By Ruth Lupton and Rebecca Tunstall